Can mobile boosters interfere with hospital medical equipment?

Updated September 2025

Mobile signal boosters can, under specific conditions, interfere with hospital medical equipment. However, the overall risk is low when boosters are properly designed, installed, and managed according to electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) best practices. While most interference studies focus on mobile phones, booster-specific incidents are rare. Hospitals can mitigate risks through zoning, shielding, filtering, and regulatory compliance.

Follow-Up Questions 

What types of medical equipment are most vulnerable to RF interference?

• Devices like ECG monitors, infusion pumps, ventilators, and older diagnostic machines tend to be more sensitive, especially if lacking robust EMC shielding.

How close is too close for booster antennas near sensitive zones?

• Generally, maintaining a minimum distance of 2 metres from critical equipment is advised, though site-specific EMI assessments should validate this.

Can newer technologies like 5G increase the risk?

• Potentially, yes. 5G and mmWave introduce different frequencies and modulation schemes. Many legacy devices were not tested against these bands, so caution is needed.

What’s the best way to monitor booster impact post-deployment?

• Install RF sensors, define alert thresholds, and correlate any anomalies with medical equipment logs. Include these in your EMI safety case.

Understanding the Basics: Mobile Boosters and Electromagnetic Interference

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) occurs when unwanted electromagnetic energy disrupts the normal operation of electronic devices. In hospitals, sensitive equipment like monitors, infusion pumps, and imaging systems can be vulnerable if exposed to strong RF fields.

Mobile signal boosters work by amplifying and retransmitting cellular signals within a building. Compared to mobile phones, they:

• Cover wider areas
  
• Emit stronger RF fields
  
• Operate continuously
  
• May be installed close to sensitive equipment
  

These factors can elevate EMI risk beyond that posed by handsets. Assessment must consider emitter strength, distance, frequency, coupling paths, and medical device immunity levels.

What the Evidence Says: Studies of Mobile Device Interference in Hospitals

Studies show that mobile phones can interfere with a small subset of medical devices, particularly when used in close proximity (within 1 metre). For example:

• A review by Lawrentschuk et al. found that out of 479 devices tested at 900 MHz, 45 experienced interference.
  
• Van Lieshout et al. documented interference in critical care monitors caused by nearby phones.
  
• Other studies note that monitors, ECG machines, and infusion pumps are among the more vulnerable.
  

However, these events are rare, especially with spatial separation. The GSMA states there are no confirmed cases of hospital interference from base stations or boosters, though specific booster-focused studies remain limited.

Why Boosters Are Different: Amplifiers, Power, Feedback & Proximity Effects

Boosters introduce unique risks not present with phones:

• Higher field strength: Boosters may emit stronger signals, especially in weak coverage zones.
  
• Wider exposure: One booster may affect multiple nearby devices simultaneously.
  
• Feedback and oscillation: Poor design or cable routing can cause RF feedback.
  
• Proximity to equipment: Antennas may be installed near critical medical zones.
  
• Longer exposure: Boosters operate continuously, unlike intermittent phone use.
  

These elements warrant more conservative risk margins in hospital installations.

Modern Technologies & New Risks: 5G, mmWave, IoT

The shift toward newer wireless technologies brings additional EMI considerations:

• 5G and mmWave: These use wider and sometimes higher frequencies. Some hospital equipment may be more susceptible to harmonics or emissions in these bands.
  
• IoT devices: Many are low-power and potentially more vulnerable to RF fields.
  
• Legacy medical equipment: Older devices may lack immunity to modern modulation schemes.
  
• Higher density deployments: Increased use of small cells and boosters creates more overlapping fields.
  

The lack of robust booster-specific EMI studies in modern bands suggests caution is warranted.

Design Strategies to Minimise Risk

Key practices to reduce interference risk in hospital environments include:

• Zoning: Create exclusion zones around sensitive areas (ICUs, imaging suites).
  
• Shielding: Use metallic enclosures or shielding for rooms and booster equipment.
  
• Filtering: Apply bandpass or low-pass filters to suppress spurious emissions.
  
• Directional antennas: Aim antennas away from sensitive zones and use controlled gain.
  
• Cable isolation: Route booster cables away from medical device wiring.
  
• Power control: Use only the necessary output power with margin for attenuation.
  
• Grounding and EMC best practices: Ensure proper grounding and avoid loops.
  
• Incremental testing: Commission systems step-by-step and monitor nearby devices.
  
• Adaptive operation: Reduce power or schedule downtime during sensitive procedures.
  
• Continuous monitoring: Deploy RF sensors to detect excessive emissions.
  

Standards, Compliance & Risk Frameworks

Relevant frameworks for hospital deployments include:

• IEC 60601‑1‑2: Defines medical equipment immunity and emission levels.
  
• Medical Device Regulation (MDR, EU) / MHRA (UK): Requires demonstration of safety and performance.
  
• EMC Directive: Mandates electromagnetic compatibility for all electronics.
  
• Risk-based approach: Identify hazards, assess severity and likelihood, implement mitigations.
  

Operational best practices:

• Involve clinical and biomedical engineers in the design phase
  
• Maintain documentation and control change processes
  
• Define acceptance criteria during commissioning
  
• Train staff on restricted zones and booster awareness
  

Conclusion & Recommendations

Mobile boosters can interfere with hospital equipment if poorly designed or installed, but the risk is manageable with best practices. Key recommendations:

• Treat booster deployments as part of your hospital’s EMC strategy
  
• Apply IEC 60601‑1‑2 standards and complete a risk-based EMI assessment
  
• Maintain spatial separation, filtering, shielding, and monitoring systems
  
• Include clinical and engineering teams early in the project
  

Decision Checklist for Hospital Planners

Consideration	Recommended Practice
Antenna placement	>2 metres from sensitive equipment
RF power levels	Use minimum required gain/output
Shielding & filters	Implement as needed based on layout
Monitoring	Continuous RF level tracking with alerts
EMI risk assessment	Documented risk analysis and mitigation plan
Commissioning	Validate medical device function under load
Ongoing control	Changes trigger new EMI validation

---

Next Step: Get a Professional Audit

Concerned about RF interference in your facility?
Speak to our technical team to request a tailored booster deployment audit. We’ll help you:

• Validate RF safety around critical care areas
  
• Ensure compliance with IEC and EMC standards
  
• Document your EMI risk profile and mitigation plan
  
• Future-proof your hospital’s wireless infrastructure
  

Frequently Asked Questions

Do mobile boosters pose more risk than mobile phones?

• Yes, because boosters emit stronger RF fields and may affect a larger area. However, with proper engineering, the risk is low.

Can we use boosters in ICU or imaging areas?

• Not directly. These areas should be designated as exclusion zones, with antennas located outside and signal levels strictly controlled.

Is shielding always necessary?

• Not always, but it is recommended in high-risk zones or older facilities with sensitive equipment.

How do we confirm booster installations are safe?

• Through documented EMI testing, commissioning trials, continuous RF monitoring, and stakeholder validation.

Are there regulations specifically banning boosters in hospitals?

• No, but booster use must comply with EMC, MDR and IEC standards — and must not compromise medical device operation.